Channel 4 story on cattle exports

[Anthony Butcher]

There was a very good news item on the Channel 4 News this evening, covered here to some extent:

Channel 4 - News - Exporting organic calves for veal?

Exclusive: Channel 4 News reports on the row splitting the organic community about whether organic male calves should be exported for veal production.
The knackerman is an integral part of dairy farming on both conventional and organic farms.

He slaughters thousands of perfectly healthy one-day old male calves because the industry doesn't deem these milk breeds good enough for beef.

"Organic calves or non organic calves it doesn't matter, if the farmer doesn't have the ability to rear the calves himself then we put them down." - Tony Holdsworth, Duke of Beaufort's Hunt

'We don't want any calves being disposed of that is a waste'
Helen Browning, The Soil Association

The practice is accepted in non-organic dairy herds, but does it fit in with the organic creed with its higher standards of animal welfare? The Soil Association, the leading body on organic foods, thinks not.

"We don't want any calves being disposed of that is a waste." - Helen Browning, The Soil Association

In their update to be published this month they stated: "It is not right that an organic system should be so unbalanced and wasteful of what it produces - consumers do not expect organic dairy calves to suffer the same fate as non-organic."

'The importance of export is absolutely fundamental to the current and future well being of dairy farms'
Peter Kingwell, Premier Livestock Auctions

But with organic milk sales rocketing 136 per cent in the past three years, about 6,000 calves from these herds are now culled every year. Animal welfare groups are against this slaughter.

The alternative for these male calves may be even less palatable to the organic consumer. We have spoken to cattle dealers who say they are exporting calves from organic dairy herds for intensive veal production in conditions deemed illegal in the UK - most are destined for Holland.

It's 12 years now since protestors blocked the roads to trucks exporting live animals. The practice was then banned, not because of moral objections, but because of the BSE scare.

But those restrictions were lifted in May last year and live exports are now back with calves from organic herds amongst the livestock being shipped to the continent.

But for the farmers there's no room for emotion, these exports are vital to the economic survival of their business.

"The importance of export is absolutely fundamental to the current and future well being of dairy farms." - Peter Kingwell, Premier Livestock Auctions

Consumers pay more for organic products trusting that they represent high standards of animal welfare. Producers rely on the organic bodies that give them their organic status to set the rules.

And here's where the confusion lies - different bodies have different standards and two of the biggest allow exportation for veal production.

"We don't physically ban the export of male calves in our standards because we be believe it to be unworkable. Farmers are under immense pressure these days, they have a big disposable problem in a dairy herd with male calves." Julian Wade - Organic Food Federation

Until every organic body signs up to the banning of live calf exports, organic milk from farms that condone the practice will still reach the supermarket shelves. Leaving it to the consumer to decide if this milk should still be labelled organic.

[Astrocat]

The issue here seems to be that people correlate 'organic' with 'high standards of animal welfare' , even though there's not necessarily any correlation between the two.

It is similar , i think, to the way in which a lot of people like to think that fairly traded food is somehow related to organic food (ie, assuming that if something is fairly traded then it will also be organic) , even though most fairly traded food is not organic, and the two standards are not necessarily connected in any way.

"It is not right that an organic system should be so unbalanced and wasteful of what it produces - consumers do not expect organic dairy calves to suffer the same fate as non-organic."

Then, it sounds like those consumers need to read up on what 'organic' means...

The term 'organic' in terms of produce or food products, simply means 'produced without artificial or chemical fertilizers or pesticides.'

I am left wondering .... what fate do they imagine these organic dairy calves would be going to, if not the same one as any other calves within the animal 'agriculture' industries ? And why would they imagine that ?

But for the farmers there's no room for emotion, these exports are vital to the economic survival of their business.

Anybody who thinks that buying dairy products doesn't directly support the live-export veal industry, take heed !

Rather than getting involved in contemplation about whether the fundamental definition of 'organic' should be changed to changed to include a completely seperate thing altogether, or not, I reckon that those consumers would be better advised to decide whether they want to continue to mentally-label organic animal products as being "By definition, produced to high standards of animal welfare in my opinion"

If it is more profitable to treat organic animals a bit better than non-organic ones, organic farmers are likely to treat organic animals slightly better than non-organic ones.
But, consumers can be sure that many of them will take their chances to treat their organic animals poorly, if it means making a little bit more profit.